Friday, April 27, 2007

Ethanol

We hear a lot about ethanol usage recently. They're even planning to build an ethanol plant in our tiny little township.

Yesterday I mentioned that there are two gas stations available in the nearby city that sell real gas. In other words, ethanol-free. My dad asked why I'd want the non-ethanol gas. I said because you get worse mileage with ethanol-laced gas. He asked why I didn't want to support the farmers.

Well, how many reasons do I want to take space for?

For one thing, there's the study released from Stanford University last week. Environment Science and Technology Online reported that E-85 (the high-ethanol gas) actually creates more pollution and ozone, and thus will be more damaging to health than gasoline made from oil. The scientist even projected how many hundreds of people would die annually because of the switch to higher use of ethanol.

Ethanol costs more to the consumer because you need more of it to get somewhere.

Ethanol uses so much fuel in being produced (such as the tractors necessary to do the farming) that the savings in gasoline are consumed in the production of alternative fuel.

And then there's the cost of corn. Sure, high corn prices puts money in the pocket of the farmers who grow corn. But what about the farmers who are buying feed-corn for their hogs and cows and laying hens? They're hurting already, and it's going to get worse.

And then there are the direct food prices. Germans are upset over rising beer prices and there were riots in Mexico over skyrocketing tortilla prices.

Being less dependent on foreign oil is something America needs to work on. But we don't need ethanol. We have oil. We just haven't been willing to put in more pipelines from Alaska or pump more oil out of the Gulf.

As for the choice between ethanol and gasoline, I'm planning to keep buying my real gas as long as possible. It's all for the sake of environmental cleanliness, of course.

5 comments:

  1. There was talk of an ethanol plant being put up in our community a few years back. At the time I read some sites online about ethanol plants themselves. It wasn't a good thing...*way* more negatives than positives.

    It did get voted down here.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post.

    Few will listen.

    Ethanol is untenable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We have a number of them going up in our tiny county (smallest county in the state I believe). I have already seen building sites with lots of trees being bulldozed. One had a beautiful old barn on it that was still in good shape. When I pointed it out to my kids, they asked why? Presumably to plant a few more acres of corn. When the bottom falls out, a lot of farmers are going to be hurting too!

    ReplyDelete
  4. We are small time farmers and the price of corn has skyrocketed. We HAVE to raise the price of our happy chickens/broilers or why bother doing this at all. If we are affected that much I cannot imagine what this is doing to the big farmers. Then.....because people are paying more at the pump, paying for better quality happy free range chickens and pork is less important to them as it hurts their pockets even more. The boys are looking for new ways to make an income at this point. I agree with you Susan.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Someone wrote to me and pointed out the problems with ethanol plants using up loads of water. St Louis Today has an article on the problem of running short of water. That news really hits hard after so many years of drought here, and with so many of our neighbors having had their wells run dry even before an ethanol plant will arrive here.

    ReplyDelete