Wow -- if yesterday was a referendum on That Nasty War over there, I think we just voted to allow That Nasty War to come back onto our soil.
And then the other election results -- we voted in favor of higher taxes, higher gasoline prices, more govt control of private business. And in Wisconsin we voted for allowing voter fraud to continue unabated.
This week's psalm (36) and this week's verse (continue in the faith; we must through many tribulations enter the kingdom of God) sound different today than they did on Monday.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yay big government!
ReplyDelete... bigger is better, right? :)
Question: which party started That Nasty War?
ReplyDeleteWho started the war? Let's see, uhhhh, that would probably be the people who bombed us five years ago.
ReplyDeleteAs for big govt, we have a choice between the big-govt Republicans and the bigger-govt Democrats. Hopefully some day we'll get preferential voting so that another party has a chance.
As for anonymity, I do believe I mentioned to you once before that it really would be polite if you signed your name. If you're going to engage conversation, you must be afraid to be honest and upfront about your identity.
ReplyDeleteThe vote on Tuesday will only embloden the terrorists in Iraq. They were counting on America having a weak resolve and so they knew that if the just kept up the bloodshed, we would quit. Tuesday's vote will sound to them like a vote in favor of quitting. All the war protesters who were so concerned about saving American lives have just done something that will endanger them even more. Now that there is a strong antiwar sentiment in the congress, the terrorists will do even more to shed American blood, knowing that if they make the cost high enough, congress will insist on a pullout. Expect a sharp increase on American troops around the first of the year or something along the lines of a Tet offensive.
ReplyDeleteLet's face it, they have us figured out. They were counting on us doing the same thing we did in Vietnam.
The other day when Nancy Pelosi was asked whether she favors victory in Iraq or a pullout, she said, "I don't think we should define it in terms of victory and defeat but as a problem to be solved." What a clueless, ahistorical, empty-headed response. This fool is going to be influencing our foreign policy. We might as well have elected Cindy Sheehan to speaker. This does not bode well for us.
But, of course, that's just my opinion, I coul be wrong.